"We've been offered a gift here," she said. "We've been offered a gift that takes us from 45 million visitors, to 55, to 65 million visitors."
Lawmakers have been vetting the particulars of the arrangement, which some outside economists say is a bad deal based on overly optimistic predictions about how many new events and tourists the proposed domed stadium would attract.
"You might come to the conclusion that MGM would be opposed to both of the projects before you. In fact, the exact opposite is true," he said. "We know the entire community benefits when our convention center is full."
"This is an absolute dead-bang,Cheap NFL Jerseys Supply, winning opportunity,Cheap Jerseys, and I hope you will find it in your wisdom to approve it shortly," Wynn told lawmakers, saying professional sports would be a cornerstone to the stability of Nevada tourism. "I personally believe that if we lose this opportunity, it will be one of the most heartbreaking mistakes we've ever made."
"Let's keep in mind the Adelson family is making this very significant and immensely generous investment into a stadium they won't own for a team they don't own," he said.
The testimonials are likely to add credibility and political cover to the stadium proposal,Jerseys From China, which has attracted criticism from the powerful Culinary Union and some progressive and faith-based groups who say any tax increases should first go to Nevada's bottom-ranking public school system. Adelson, one of the richest men in the world,NFL Jerseys China, wants to put $650 million of his own money toward a $1.9 billion venue and is asking for $750 million in public hotel tax revenue.
CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) — Heavy hitters in Nevada's casino industry are going to bat for a project backed by one of their competitors,NFL Jerseys China Online, saying a proposed NFL stadium and a convention center expansion in Las Vegas are game-changing opportunities that Nevada lawmakers shouldn't pass up.
Steve Hill of the Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development said the projections passed scrutiny from Las Vegas casino executives, who are more familiar with the city's tourism landscape than outside economists and are some of the business world's brightest minds.
Two-thirds of each Republican-controlled chamber of the legislature must approve any tax increase. The proposed deal would increase the hotel tax on the Las Vegas Strip by 0.88 percentage points for the stadium and 0.5 percentage points for the convention center. Tourists pay a 12 percent hotel room tax. They would pay about $1.50 more per night on the average nightly Strip hotel bill if both proposals pass.
Murren fought back against the idea that his company, the largest employer in the state and a major player in the convention industry, would be threatened by the improvements.
"Regardless of what is said here, my mind is already made up," said Democratic state Sen. Ruben Kihuen, a vocal opponent of the financing plan who is also running in an competitive race for a U.S. House seat. "Regardless of how you put it it's still a $750 million taxpayer handout."
Steve Wynn of Wynn Resorts, MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren and Caesars Entertainment Executive Vice President Jan Jones Blackhurst gave speeches Monday to Nevada lawmakers who are meeting in a special session to vet public financing for a stadium that's backed by Las Vegas Sands casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. The venue could house the Raiders.
Blackhurst, the former mayor of Las Vegas, said the projects will take the tourism mecca to the next level.
NFL owners would have to vote by a three-fourths majority to allow the Raiders to move from Oakland to Las Vegas. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has said he prefers to keep the team in the Bay Area, while the team's owner, Mark Davis, said he's serious about moving the team.
Legislative leaders say there's still work to do to round up the votes needed to approve the deal. Some lawmakers say they're fundamentally opposed to it.
President George Markantonis of The Venetian casino, which is part of the Sands company, defended the public-private partnership arrangement because it will benefit both public and private sectors and be run by a public board.